"Earn Money in Your Sleep" Is Now an Official FTC Red Flag. Go Read Your Own Sales Page.
A federal consumer-education specialist just named the phrase as a scam tell. It's also boilerplate on thousands of legitimate course landing pages.

Open your sales page. Search it for the word sleep.
On October 1, the Federal Trade Commission went public with a warning about investment-training scams spreading across social media, and consumer education specialist Terri Miller offered a one-line detection test. The tell, she said, is that "they will say you can earn money in your sleep and there's little to no risk."
That is the regulator's scam signal. It is also, close to verbatim, the opening hook on an enormous number of entirely legitimate evergreen funnels.
The scope is narrow. The wording still stings.
Miller was talking about trading education specifically. "When it comes to investing or trading, there's always risk involved," she said. "Anyone who says otherwise is a scammer." The FTC's framing: social media is full of people flashing fancy cars and exotic trips, claiming you can have the same lifestyle just by "learning to trade."
If you sell a watercolor course or a Notion template or a clinical supervision program, the literal rule doesn't bind you. But the shape of the claim is what got named — guaranteed outcome, minimal risk, no labor. The agency also warned that more dishonest companies and influencers remain active, and that many of these posts target young people.
What happened to the people who ran the biggest version of this pitch
The warning didn't come out of nowhere. It follows IM Mastery Academy.
The FTC and the Nevada Attorney General alleged in a May 2025 complaint that the scheme — operating most recently as IYOVIA, previously branded IM Mastery Academy, iMarketsLive and IM Academy — used false or baseless earnings claims to sell training on how to invest in financial markets, and that it generated more than $1.2 billion since 2018. The agency alleged the company advertised "educators" who often had no legitimate credentials.
In May 2026, the FTC and Nevada required five individual and corporate defendants, including ringleaders Chris and Isis Terry, to surrender assets valued at nearly $90 million. The proposed order imposes a $795.8 million judgment.
The asset list reads like an inventory of the marketing itself. Eight luxury homes in New York, Nevada, Florida and Dubai. Thirteen home lots in a high-end development near Las Vegas. Nineteen automobiles, including Range Rovers, BMWs, a Bentley and a Rolls Royce. A yacht. Jewelry including a 15-carat diamond ring, plus Richard Mille, Bulgari and Rolex watches.
Every one of those props existed to make the offer credible. They are now the restitution pool. A court-appointed trustee handles the liquidations; the FTC handles distribution.
Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford said more than 5,000 Nevadans were affected, with estimates that as much as $9 million was taken from residents. Truth in Advertising puts the total judgments obtained across the case at over $914 million, though only a fraction will ultimately be paid.
The clause that should actually worry you
Forget the yacht. Read this part twice.
The Terrys are permanently banned from selling trading-training services and investment opportunities, and permanently prohibited from making earnings claims without proper substantiation.
The second half isn't a custom punishment. It's the ordinary standard, written down. The FTC put businesses on notice back in 2021 that false money-making claims could lead to big penalties.
Three questions worth running against your own page this afternoon:
Can you substantiate the number? If your headline implies a typical result, you need records from real buyers showing that result is typical.
Where does "passive" quietly become "riskless"? Those are different promises. One is about delivery mechanics. The other is a claim about outcomes you don't control.
Are your testimonials exceptional, and do you say so? Screenshots of your best student, presented without context, are an earnings claim.
The honest version of the pitch converts worse. That's the real cost, and nobody selling funnel templates wants to say it out loud. But the FTC has now described the dishonest version on camera, in plain English, using words that are probably sitting on your checkout page right now.
Somewhere in Nevada, a trustee is pricing a yacht.
Sources
- FTC warns of rising investment scams on social media — Yahoo Finance
- FTC warns of rising social media investment scams — WISH-TV
- Investment training scams on the rise, FTC warns — WRTV
- Lead Defendants in the IM Mastery Academy MLM Scheme to Turn Over Tens of Millions of Dollars in Assets to Settle FTC Charges — Federal Trade Commission
- IM Mastery — Case Summary — Federal Trade Commission
- Attorney General Ford Announces Defendants in IM Mastery Scam Will Turn Over Nearly $90 Million in Assets — Nevada Attorney General
- IM Mastery defendants to hand over $90 million in assets in new settlement — Fox5 Vegas / KOLO
- UPDATE: IM Mastery Academy 'Ringleaders' Settle Government Charges — Truth in Advertising
- How to spot investment training scams on social media — DRG News (FTC consumer alert)
Editor’s note: A regulator just put industry-standard funnel language on a scam-detection list. Our readers write that language for a living.
Keep reading
Teachers Pay Teachers Went "AI-Free." Its Own Sellers Filed a Petition the Same Day.
Two of the biggest marketplaces for selling knowledge as a digital download decided within two weeks that the AI shortcut now costs more than it saves.

Coursera Reports Thursday. Last Quarter It Told Wall Street Its Margins Improved Because of 'Changes to Instructor Economics.'
The Q2 shareholder letter explains the margin story in plain English. For 95,000 instructors, the mechanism behind it was a pay cut.

"Fewer Than 15 Hours a Week" Just Cost Two Companies $1.85 Million. The Sales Team Paid Nearly Twice as Much as the Brand.
The FTC's first enforcement action against a third-party franchise sales organization sends a bill straight to the people who run the calls.

Pinterest Let Brands Advertise Other People's Pins. Six Days Later It Took It Back.
A permission that arrived on October 7 was gone by October 13 — a reminder that the reach you built on a platform is rented, not owned.
